The Explainer Video has been designed to accomplish the following:
A 4-7-minute video project in which you explain how visions for the future of Atlanta guide projects such as the Beltline, Lindsay Street Park, or Quest Community Development. For full credit videos will mix audio/video from guest speakers & site visits, with some combination of interviews, still footage, data visualization, animation, sound queues, and voice over.
Upon completion of the Explainer Video, students should be able to:
- 1. Identify and explicate the central claims/concepts of theoretical prose through a local development issue
- 2. Explain the central claims/concepts of theoretical prose in a video
- 3. Persuade an audience of their peers of the efficacy of their argument via situationally effective visual and verbal rhetoric
- 4. Respond to a rhetorical situation through process: invention, drafting, peer review, and revision
Explainer Project Checklist
Successful Videos will complete the following:
- 2. Explainer Prompt: How do visions for the future of Atlanta’s people, neighborhoods, ecosystems, and social/cultural networks shape the choices made by community partners such as the Beltline, Quest Community Development, ATL TransFormation, or Connection Conservation Fund?
- 3. Explainer Design: Video must explain the key problems/concepts, through a mix of audio from tour guides and/or guest speakers with interviews, external footage, still images, and a voice/sound track.
- 4. Explainer Specs: final draft of Explainer needs to be 4 to 7 minutes long and available as an mp4
Explainer Introduction Prompt
Successful Explainer Introductions will respond to the following prompt in 300-400 words:
Why is the sustainability topic you present in your video both psychological and social?
Compose your Poster in the design software of your choice OR you may also create your poster through collage. The following are some tool suggestions:
- Google Slides, Photoshop, or Power Point, Visme, or Canva
The Explainer is worth 20% of your total grade and will be assessed according to the final criteria adapted from the Common Feedback Chart:
- 1. Rhetorical Awareness: Does the Explainer address writing the situation (and assignment) completely and/or with unexpected insight? Does the Explainer fulfill the assigned design requirements and include an introduction? (20%)
- 2. Stance: Does the Explainer clearly articulate a unifying argument/goal? Does the video explain a key concept related to global warming and/or sustainability that is both psychological/individual and social? (20%)
- 3.Development of Ideas: Does the video develop the claim/goal by illustrating the key concept through a mix of audio from tour guides and/or guest speakers with interviews, external footage, still images, and a voice/sound track? (20%)
- 4. Organization: Does the author establish a clear pattern for reading through CRAP and color, lines, etc.? (20%)
- 5. Design for Medium: Does the video use the affordances of its mode to enhance the goal/content? For example, does the video reinforce the content of the audio track visually and vice versa? (10%)
- 6. Process: Does the final draft demonstrate planning and revision? (5%)
- 7. Conventions: Does the video meet grammar, mechanics style, and syntax conventions with few or no errors? (5%)